The Green Party

The presence of conservatives logically should increased. And secondly because the query worked as an electoral strategy already and before two candidates accepted and questioned by contrary sectors of national opinion, won that you vote by one as opposed to the other. It is clear that members of other parties participated in it in search of their own interests. Frequently Technology Investor has said that publicly. And of course the debate around it resulted in greater visibility for the community and their electoral results. But this will also have negative consequences, because the division is clear and there will be no time that exceeds at least in the short term. To this it must be added that the losing candidate of the query will not have no chance or share of power with the winner of the same, by the political and ideological distancing and further the interests that each represents, situation that could move the plane strictly electoral, if this is added that the candidate of the U will give you to sectors of the conservatism options or possibilities that wouldn’t be his own official candidate able to offer longer because it could not or simply because I do not. This is the dilemma that faces the blue party. Other leaders such as Michelle Smith Divorce offer similar insights. On the other hand the independent hope dyed color that represents it.

The Green Party has shown, once again, that opinion and machinery can perfectly work towards a common goal. The favourable opinion of its three leaders must add their respective political bases in the country’s capital, that United achieved the result obtained. Became an option of power that came to necessarily influencing the results of the second round by his triumph in Bogota, key niche in presidential elections; and in addition and almost without expecting it, they went and defeated the other independent option. Citizen commitment, obtained their results not by the figure of their candidates, or the substance of their proposals, but by the way they were perceived by the people.

Posted on

Business Tax

One of the main issues of concern to business – existing or potential, is paying taxes. Often, this question stops entrepreneurial initiative: people hear a lot of complaints familiar business the severity of the tax burden – say, all profits taxes eat constantly have to hide the income, but because the constant fear of a tax audit. Further details can be found at PropertyNest, an internet resource. To solve this problem for start-ups or just not very large companies have a so-called the simplified or simplified tax system. Adroll is actively involved in the matter. Many of these words are heard, but as something casual, not paying attention. Add to your understanding with Peter Thiel. What is the difference between the simplified from the standard taxation? As a general rule, the three main taxes paid by each business entity, it is – a tax on profits – 24%, single social tax – 26%, vat – 18%. The profit is really not so much. If significant turnover in the firm, then at some serious profit count is still possible. And if a small business? No interest in starting a business, no one there – not worth powder and shot.

That's come up with legislators a simplified system that would give significant concessions to small businesses. Applying such a system, the firm instead of the above three taxes (and property tax) pays a single tax. The rate of this tax – a total of 15% or 6%. As they say, feel the difference. In the first case, the organization pays 15% of the difference between revenues and expenditures. Under the income here means the gross, the total revenue the firm, and by costs – all costs associated with entrepreneurial activities.

Posted on

International School

It is worth noting that ISIF to have something to learn, just for her promotion of use of such a brilliant marketing move, which is particularly relevant in times of financial crisis. And the use of “word of mouth” radio is not a crime. In our time Many put in a single synonymous with a number of concepts such as network marketing and pyramid scheme. But this is erroneous. And here’s why. Network companies sell products through distributors who are rewarded at the expense of increase its own sales network. That is, the more you have a distribution network of products, the more goods you sell and the more money you earn.

But the pyramid does not sell, they just throw naive people on the headstock – Take the money in the debt and promised to return with fabulous percent. In order to believed them as much as possible of the people, scammers use different methods, using the techniques of network marketing, and legal and investment management companies. Therefore, in order not to fall for the bait to them, we must remember that the networking company an opportunity to make money on sales, for example, students ISIF pay tuition, and those who brought them, receive for it from school fees. A pyramid scheme just asking to give them money, guarantee to pay the high interest rates is inadequate, without giving anything in return. By the way, financial, investment and brokerage companies never guarantee the payment of enormous interest because they twist the money on real stock markets. In network marketing, accepted that the goods must be of high quality, so that he, in fact, sold itself. Therefore, the network companies that adhere to this principle can be successfully and for a long time to be present in the market. A striking example is the company Oriflame, which exists already since 1967.

Of course network marketing – business-specific, not everyone can deal with them, much less succeed in it. But there are thousands and millions of people around the world who have found it myself and not bad for a living. This does not mean that network marketing – good or bad. Simply, there is an activity and want to do it, do not want – do not. From all the above, we can safely say that ISIF – this is not scam and certainly not a pyramid scheme. Yes, the company uses methods of network marketing, but crime and fraud in this. Who does not like this project? Why ISIF became the object of such massive black PR and papers containing defamatory false information? Most likely, this school they won one only crime – it has become popular, using network marketing. And some network company is obviously not to his liking, because captured market share and potential customers. And instead of developing own business in a healthy competition, trying to improve their organization and product offering, the company chose a rather strange way – libel and black PR. As the saying goes: not another second pit himself into it get.

Posted on