So manner, violating the basic tenet of the case of administrative violation of Art. 24.1. Administrative Code, the inspector directly interferes with the establishment of facts. Economist pursues this goal as well. Well, time will prevent, then hides the opposite – there are no grounds for prosecution, for that trial judges should pay attention. Remember, you still talk record, direct evidence of misconduct Inspector, which can be used in court in his favor. Now, increasingly began to carry out the inspector DPS video traffic violations. However, as practice shows, the video made by the inspectors DPS used at most as psychological pressure, encouraging the driver confessed to the “offense”. Sander gerber hudson bay may not feel the same. Because of the organizational costs associated with the acquisition of electronic media, labor-intensive operation, no small amount of recorded information and storing, the video traffic violations made by the inspectors of DPS after completing administrative materials does not go beyond their own noses.
The media is cleaned and so on until the next meeting of the “client.” When it comes out of the traffic police comes into court, the details produced video disappear. As a rule, the court in their request to the DPS inspectors to submit video or photo – proof traffic violations, they are meaningless answer: “Every record you did not write” I disagree “, which means you automatically agree, therefore, to report we do not put pictures or videos and remove from the stick. In Otherwise, we will, of course, provided the material justice. ” Such examples are myriad. On the road should always be ready to fight for their legitimate rights and be able to defend themselves quite professionally. In such controversial cases should not be denied, the commission of the maneuver. On the contrary, is proof that perfect maneuver (travel under set in violation of the GOST mark, or exit to the side of a road designated in the motion opposite direction) is not a violation of traffic regulations of the Russian Federation, since there are no restrictions for its implementation. Not least because, if stop illegal activities of individual inspectors dps unnecessary compilation protocols that can save tens of other innocent drivers who unwittingly may get into the net of lawlessness.